CHIDIST in Apple Numbers: right-tail chi-square probabilities
Compute one-tailed chi-square probabilities in Apple Numbers, with numeric thresholds, examples and common tail-direction mistakes.
Verification status: See the evidence and test scope described in this guide. How formula examples are checked
Quick answer. =CHIDIST(5,2) has the independently computed value 0.0820849986238988. It is the probability of a chi-square random variable with 2 degrees of freedom being at least 5, not the left-tail cumulative probability. Apple’s English documentation defines CHIDIST(x-value, degrees-freedom) and describes a one-tailed result. [A1, C1]
Availability and version history
- Introduced: Documented in Apple’s Formulas and Functions Help 15.4; the original introduction release is not established.
- Availability: Currently documented for Numbers in that help version; it is not a final supported-version endpoint.
- Scope: Shared iWork function help. Availability in individual clients and older releases is not established by this check.
- Checked: October 14, 2026, against the official CHIDIST reference. Documentation check; not a new native test.
What CHIDIST measures
For a test statistic X following a chi-square distribution with ν degrees of freedom, this function returns the upper-tail survival probability P(X ≥ x). A smaller result means an x this large or larger is unusual under that reference distribution. A distribution calculation is not, by itself, proof that a model’s assumptions or the degrees-of-freedom selection are correct. Chi-square distributions are continuous: an equality at a precise x has zero probability, so P(X≥x) and P(X>x) have equal mathematical values. [A1, C1]
Use CHIDIST when you already have a nonnegative statistic, have identified appropriate degrees of freedom, and want the right-tail area; common contexts include right-tailed goodness-of-fit and contingency-table statistics. It does not calculate the chi-square test statistic from a raw table; Apple’s separate CHITEST reference serves a different purpose. [A1, A6]
Exact syntax and argument types
=CHIDIST(x-value, degrees-freedom)
| Position | Official argument | Type | Required | Documented restriction | Default |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | x-value |
Number value | Yes | x-value ≥ 0 |
None |
| 2 | degrees-freedom |
Number value | Yes | degrees-freedom ≥ 1 |
None |
Apple provides no optional arguments. Enter the statistic first and the degrees of freedom second: reversing them changes the distribution, potentially without making the formula visibly invalid. The Apple reference calls both inputs numeric; it does not document a universal rounding/coercion rule for noninteger degrees of freedom. Use a legitimate, typically integer df from your statistical method rather than claiming Numbers rounds it in a specified way. [A1, A2]
Build a reproducible Numbers worksheet
Create one Numbers table named ChiSquareTail. Use column B for Statistic x, column C for Degrees df, and column D for Right-tail probability. Put these headers in row 1. Enter B2:C7 according to the table; put =CHIDIST(B2,C2) in D2, then fill D2 down to D7. Cell references are relative within the same Numbers table, not Excel sheet-name notation. Format D2:D7 as Number (for example, 8–12 decimals) rather than percentage if you want to see the small tail values clearly. [A2, A3]
| Row | B: statistic x | C: df | Formula in D | Expected upper-tail result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 2 | =CHIDIST(B2,C2) |
1 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | =CHIDIST(B3,C3) |
0.606530659712633 |
| 4 | 5 | 2 | =CHIDIST(B4,C4) |
0.0820849986238988 |
| 5 | 10 | 10 | =CHIDIST(B5,C5) |
0.440493285065212 |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | =CHIDIST(B6,C6) |
0.0253473186774683 |
| 7 | 4 | 4 | =CHIDIST(B7,C7) |
0.406005849709838 |
Rows 4–6 reproduce the input values and reported outputs in Apple’s published examples; other rows are independent mathematical predictions. Do not imply this table was actually entered into the Numbers application. [A1, C1]
Advanced patterns worth understanding
1. Interpret a right-tail p-value without reversing it
=CHIDIST(6,2) mathematically gives 0.0497870683678639, just under 0.05. For a valid chi-square right-tailed test with ν=2 this meets the conventional 5% rejection threshold. It does not establish that every chi-square procedure is right-tailed, nor replace checks of expected counts or independence. The left-tail mathematical probability at the same x is 1-CHIDIST(6,2), approximately 0.950212931632136; this subtraction is a calculation from probability theory, not a separately documented Numbers function mode. [A1, C1]
2. Compute a varying-df quality-control column
If a results table has x statistics in B2:B101 and degrees of freedom in C2:C101, fill =CHIDIST(B2,C2) down column D. Each row uses its own ν; do not accidentally freeze the df to a first row unless every test truly shares a df. For a constant df stored in C2, Numbers’ absolute-reference form =CHIDIST(B2,$C$2) can keep that cell fixed when copied. [A1, A3]
3. Compare a statistic to a critical value
=CHIINV(0.05,2) has independently calculated critical value 5.99146454710798. For a χ² right-tailed test with 2 df, x=6 exceeds that cutoff and has CHIDIST result 0.049787…. This is the same decision expressed as statistic-versus-threshold and tail-probability-versus-alpha; CHIINV is an upper-tail inverse, not a left-tail percentile. [A1, A6, C1]
4. Numerically cross-check the inverse
=CHIDIST(CHIINV(0.1,10),10)
The independent mathematical expectation is 0.1 (subject to finite floating-point precision). If a rounded display shows 0.100000, that is usually formatting rather than an error. This check tests the mathematical relationship; it is not a native Numbers formula-execution result. [A1, A6, C1]
Troubleshooting and limitations
| Symptom or formula | Why it is problematic | Corrective step |
|---|---|---|
=CHIDIST(-1,2) |
x violates Apple’s nonnegative documented domain. | Supply a genuine x≥0 statistic; don’t take ABS merely to force validity. |
=CHIDIST(5,0) |
df violates the documented minimum 1. | Recalculate the proper degrees of freedom. |
=CHIDIST(5) |
The second required argument is missing. | Add df, e.g. =CHIDIST(5,2). |
=CHIDIST(2,5) when x=5, df=2 |
Arguments were reversed. | Put x first, df second. |
Expecting ~0.918 for =CHIDIST(5,2) |
Mistakes the right-tail for the left-tail probability. | The right-tail is ~0.082085; left-tail is 1−that. |
Entering '5' as text |
The function is documented for numeric values, not unspecified text conversion. | Store the cell as a Number and remove text-only characters. |
| Copying a formula to a second table | Spreadsheet references may require explicit table names. | Use Numbers table references and confirm referenced table headers. |
Apple does not prescribe a specific error-message token for every invalid case in this function article; we therefore do not promise #NUM! or other Excel-style errors. Nor is cross-platform rounding/precision guaranteed in the article. [A1, A3]
Accuracy, compatibility, locale, and edition
The English 15.4 help entry documents CHIDIST and its argument order. It does not certify that this identifier existed in every historical Mac/iPhone/iPad release, nor certify parity after exporting a spreadsheet to other apps. Apple documents that =CHIDIST(...) can be typed in either letter case. Where the comma is the decimal separator, use semicolons between arguments—for example =CHIDIST(5;2). Decimal point and comma display depend on the document locale. [A1, A2, A4, A5]
For Numbers’ cross-table references, the documented syntax uses the table’s actual name, for example =CHIDIST(ChiSquareTail::B4,ChiSquareTail::C4) from another table; cross-sheet references may include a sheet-qualified name. Prefer clicking cells in the formula editor rather than guessing a renamed table’s syntax. [A3]
Frequently asked questions
Is a CHIDIST result the chance the null hypothesis is true? No. It is a tail probability under a specified reference distribution and modeling assumptions, not a probability assigned to the truth of a hypothesis.
Can CHIDIST replace CHITEST? Not without first computing an appropriate chi-square statistic and df. They are separately documented functions with different inputs.
Is CHIDIST(0,2) invalid? No; Apple allows x≥0, and the chi-square upper-tail survival at x=0 is mathematically 1.
Related Apple Numbers functions
Official references and validation record
- [A1] Apple, CHIDIST, Formulas and Functions Help, English documentation path 15.4: https://support.apple.com/guide/functions/chidist-ffa5a6a7f0/15.4/web/1.0. Checked 2026-10-13 UTC. Establishes the name, positional arguments, documented domains and Apple examples.
- [A2] Apple, Functions overview, edition 15.4: https://support.apple.com/guide/functions/functions-overview-ffa083bef0c/15.4/web/1.0. Checked 2026-10-13 UTC. Establishes function syntax conventions, required versus optional arguments, case-insensitive names, and semicolon separators in decimal-comma locales.
- [A3] Apple, Refer to cells in formulas, edition 15.4: https://support.apple.com/guide/functions/refer-to-cells-in-formulas-ffa550d691/15.4/web/1.0. Checked 2026-10-13 UTC. Establishes same-table references, named tables, cross-sheet references and range syntax.
- [A4] Apple, What’s new in Numbers on Mac: https://support.apple.com/en-mt/guide/numbers/tan700f60676/mac. Checked 2026-10-13 UTC. This current release note discusses newly introduced functions; it does not independently establish when CHIDIST was first supported.
- [A5] Apple, Formulas and Functions Help: https://support.apple.com/guide/functions/welcome-ffa361f2d90/web. Checked 2026-10-13 UTC. Applies to the documented Numbers/iWork ecosystem; no native per-device regression testing was performed here.
- [A6] Apple, CHIINV, Formulas and Functions Help, English version 15.4: https://support.apple.com/guide/functions/chiinv-ffa5b3d428/15.4/web/1.0. Checked 2026-10-13 UTC; establishes the cross-reference function and argument interpretation.
- [C1] Independent numerical verification, 2026-10-13 UTC: standard chi-square/binomial distributions evaluated with local open-source Python SciPy (
scipy.stats.chi2andscipy.stats.binom), and exactmath.combsums for the binomial mass checks. These are mathematical expectations, not observations from an Apple Numbers app.
Native-validation limitations: Formulas were not executed in Numbers on Mac, iPhone, iPad, or iCloud. Screenshots, localized behavior and historical edition support have not been verified.