IMSECH Function (Gnumeric)
Learn the IMSECH function in Gnumeric: Returns the hyperbolic secant of a complex number.
Verification status: Official documentation referenced; example outcomes independently reasoned or arithmetically checked where stated. Not executed in Gnumeric. How formula examples are checked
Evidence: Official documentation and exact Gnumeric 1.12.62 source were inspected. Numeric examples are independent calculations; native execution, locale behavior and workbook round-trips remain untested.
What IMSECH calculates
IMSECH evaluates the complex hyperbolic secant of a complex argument z. Its mathematical definition is sech(z) = 1/cosh(z). Unlike the ordinary secant, hyperbolic secant takes the reciprocal of cosh(z), not cos(z). It equals 1 at z=0, but can be complex at other complex inputs. This is a complex-number operation, not a substitution of individual real and imaginary coefficients. M1 S1
For z=x+iy, cosh(z)=cosh(x)cos(y)+i sinh(x)sin(y). Its reciprocal has both real and imaginary components unless the expression happens to be purely real or purely imaginary.
Version-specific error distinction: The online 1.12 manual describes malformed complex inputs as
#VALUE!. The official 1.12.62 source instead returns#NUM!when parsing a malformed complex string; other unsupported value types can still return#VALUE!. Any#VALUE!expectations below are the manual’s older documented rule, not verified 1.12.62 output. No native error test was performed.
Exact syntax, argument order, accepted form, and defaults
=IMSECH(z)
| Argument | Position | Type | Required | Default |
|---|---|---|---|---|
z |
1 | One valid complex number, commonly a complex string such as "1+2i", "2-j", a cell holding such a result, or COMPLEX(real,imaginary) |
Yes | None; no optional arguments |
The Gnumeric manual documents exactly one parameter named z for IMSECH; a call like IMSECH(real,imaginary) is not its documented syntax. Gnumeric’s COMPLEX(x,y,i) helper provides a complex number from real and imaginary coefficients, and its optional suffix is "i" or "j" (default "i"). That helper is documented by Gnumeric; it is not an assumption derived from another spreadsheet. M1
Use =IMSECH("1+2i") for a direct literal, =IMSECH(COMPLEX(1,2)) for coefficient-based entry, or put =COMPLEX(1,2) in A4 and use =IMSECH(A4).
The examples use English-style numeric points and commas for the COMPLEX helper. Function separators and parsing/display of numbers can depend on installed Gnumeric locale. This guide does not certify every locale: when pasting formulas, use the application’s local formula editor and test any suffix- or decimal-specific differences rather than assuming the same notation is accepted in another configured language.
Quick start
=IMSECH("1+2i")
=IMSECH(COMPLEX(1,2))
=IMSECH("2-j")
The two first formulas represent the same mathematical input. For z=1+2i, the independent expected result is approximately -0.4131493443−0.6875274387i. Displayed digits, i/j suffix, internal precision and any error token can differ from these independently computed values. A Gnumeric-native comparison remains to be performed.
Build a fully reproducible worksheet
In a new Gnumeric spreadsheet, label A1 Complex input and B1 IMSECH result. Enter the COMPLEX formulas in column A and the specified function formulas in column B. Column B’s last column below gives mathematical expected output rounded to 8 decimals, not an observed Gnumeric display:
| Input cell | Enter this exact worksheet formula in A | Enter this in B | Independently calculated expected value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A2 | =COMPLEX(1,0) |
=IMSECH(A2) |
0.64805427 |
| A3 | =COMPLEX(0,1) |
=IMSECH(A3) |
1.85081572 |
| A4 | =COMPLEX(1,2) |
=IMSECH(A4) |
-0.41314934−0.68752744i |
| A5 | =COMPLEX(-0.5,0.25) |
=IMSECH(A5) |
0.90270369+0.10651712i |
| A6 | =COMPLEX(3,4) |
=IMSECH(A6) |
-0.06529403+0.07522496i |
| A7 | =COMPLEX(0.5,-0.75) |
=IMSECH(A7) |
1.02250867+0.44019684i |
| A8 | =COMPLEX(2,-1) |
=IMSECH(A8) |
0.15117630+0.22697368i |
| A9 | =COMPLEX(0,0) |
=IMSECH(A9) |
1.00000000 |
Rows use =COMPLEX(real,imag) for reproducibility instead of depending on a hand-typed complex string being auto-converted. Zero-input row A9 is included as a domain test: sech(0)=1 is finite, so the independent mathematical result is 1. Finite results were independently calculated with Python 3’s cmath on 2026-10-13. The calculations and residual checks are archived alongside this manuscript. Compare IMREAL and IMAGINARY coefficients to reasonable numeric tolerances rather than comparing literal output strings.
To exercise the documented alternative imaginary-unit suffix, enter =COMPLEX(1,2,"j") in a separate input cell and =IMSECH(that_cell). The upstream parser/formatter carries an imaginary-unit choice, but exact formatting in the packaged 1.12.62 application has not been observed. M1 S1
Worked example: evaluate the function correctly
With z=1+2i, cosh(z)=cosh(1)cos(2)+i sinh(1)sin(2). Its complex reciprocal is sech(z) ≈ −0.4131493443−0.6875274387i. The direct mathematical identity is sech(z) = 1/cosh(z); the key step is evaluating the complex denominator and applying complex division. M1
A second input, z=2−i, yields approximately 0.1511762983+0.2269736754i. This shows that changing the sign of the imaginary coefficient can alter both parts of the output. For real inputs, the result may be purely real; that does not make IMSECH a real-only function.
Validate the reciprocal identity
Set A4 to =COMPLEX(1,2). Compare the documented direct function with a mathematically equivalent formula:
=IMSECH(A4)
=IMDIV("1",IMCOSH(A4))
=IMPRODUCT(IMSECH(A4),IMCOSH(A4))
The complex quotient should agree with the direct hyperbolic secant at non-pole inputs. The third formula should evaluate to ≈ 1+0i, within floating-point tolerance. This is an independent algebraic expectation and a suggestion for a future Gnumeric-native QA test, not proof that all three were executed here. Gnumeric documents the involved related functions in its Complex manual. M1
The complex hyperbolic identity sech²(z)+tanh²(z)=1 holds wherever cosh(z)≠0. Using the complex IMPOWER/IMSUM functions is needed for a spreadsheet coefficient-by-coefficient check. Apply it only where the denominator is not zero.
Advanced application: magnitude and mathematical consistency
Complex envelope in a model: compute B4==IMSECH(A4), C4==IMABS(B4) and, separately, a phase with =IMARGUMENT(B4). Those describe magnitude and phase of a mathematical complex-valued factor; establish a valid model before interpreting them as physical attenuation.
Hyperbolic identity cross-check: at A4==COMPLEX(1,2), calculate =IMSUM(IMPOWER(IMSECH(A4),"2"),IMPOWER(IMTANH(A4),"2")). This should be approximately 1 as a complex quantity. Independently check =IMPRODUCT(IMSECH(A4),IMCOSH(A4)) ≈ 1.
Extract coefficients for dependable comparisons: use =IMREAL(B4) and =IMAGINARY(B4) where B4 contains a complex result. Gnumeric also documents IMABS(B4) for magnitude. A string representation with a suffix is not an ordinary decimal number; numerical equality should be tested component by component, with a tolerance supported by the engineering or scientific context. M1
Do not confuse hyperbolic with circular trigonometry. Ordinary sine/cosine are periodic along the real line, while hyperbolic sine/cosine have different growth and singularity properties in the complex plane. The identity used in this tutorial is specific to IMSECH; switching to a similarly named circular or hyperbolic function changes the mathematical problem.
Domain, poles, precision, and stability
cosh(z)=0 at z=i(π/2+kπ), for integer k. Hyperbolic secant is mathematically undefined there, but at z=0 its value is exactly 1. Beware numeric values near the imaginary poles.
Inspect =IMABS(IMCOSH(A4)) near suspected poles. At large positive real parts, cosh may grow far beyond normal floating-point range, and the direct hyperbolic calculation can lose accuracy or overflow.
Complex floating-point calculations may show rounding, trailing-zero suppression, underflow, overflow or loss of precision. In particular, a formula evaluated with a finite floating approximation to π may produce a large numeric result instead of a mathematically exact pole. Near-singular evaluations are poor grounds for testing literal string equality. Runtime error behavior must be checked with the installed application.
Errors and troubleshooting (documentation vs observed behavior)
| Symptom or input | What the evidence supports | Troubleshooting action |
|---|---|---|
"not-complex" or another malformed complex string |
The official web manual generically states #VALUE!; inspected official 1.12.62 help says #NUM! for invalid z and calls value_get_as_complex. The official 1.12.62 parser also returns #NUM! for malformed strings; native display remains untested. |
Use a genuine complex value, preferably =COMPLEX(1,2); note the actual native error during required testing. |
| Blank cell or coercion from nonnumeric text/Boolean | The manual specifies a complex argument but does not certify every implicit conversion. The inspected current implementation parses/dispatches types rather than relying on another spreadsheet’s rules. | Enter explicit COMPLEX(real,imag) values and test blanks/type conversion natively; do not extrapolate from Excel or LibreOffice. |
| Zero or a mathematical pole | cosh(z)=0 at z=i(π/2+kπ), for integer k. Hyperbolic secant is mathematically undefined there, but at z=0 its value is exactly 1. Beware numeric values near the imaginary poles. | Verify domain first. Do not assume any specific #DIV/0!, #NUM!, or #VALUE! label without a native Gnumeric check. |
| Huge/unexpectedly unstable result | A small reciprocal denominator can amplify input error. | Calculate the denominator magnitude and inspect proximity to a pole; examine the underlying model and choose precision appropriately. |
| A text-looking complex output fails a numeric operation | Complex values are represented or formatted with i/j, and plain arithmetic on a text representation may not match complex operations. |
Use IMREAL, IMAGINARY, IMABS, IMDIV, IMPRODUCT or another documented complex function instead of unvalidated text arithmetic. |
| Formula copied from another locale fails | The guide’s English numeric and argument punctuation may not match configured formula/decimal rules. | Use the Gnumeric formula editor and local convention; test suffix entry on that edition. |
| Formula not found in an installed version | An official catalogue entry is evidence of registration and project support, not proof of availability in an unknown local package or historical edition. | Verify installed Gnumeric version, function browser and plug-in setup; document any package differences. |
Manual-versus-source discrepancy matters: as of 2026-10-13, the public manual’s invalid-argument note uses #VALUE!, whereas source help in the inspected 1.12.62 branch uses #NUM! for invalid z and the implementation forwards a parser-specific standard error. The exact official 1.12.62 release source was inspected separately for this review. This guide intentionally does not invent native error observations. M1 S1
Version, platform, aliases and software compatibility
- Gnumeric-specific syntax: Official Complex manual documents
IMSECH(z)as a one-argument complex function. M1 - Catalogue registration and implementation: The official public function catalogue currently classifies IMSECH as Complete / Exhaustive. This is upstream implementation/test-suite metadata; no native Gnumeric execution was conducted for this guide. C1
- Release implementation: The exact official 1.12.62 callback parses one complex argument and computes the reciprocal of complex hyperbolic cosine. Invalid complex results map to
#NUM!; this is source inspection, not observed application output. S1 - Release/platform: The Gnumeric team announced version 1.12.62 in September 2026 and generic improvements to complex-function Excel compatibility. This manuscript has not executed native Gnumeric binaries on Linux or any other platform, has not inspected package-specific builds, and makes no undocumented Windows/macOS release support promise. R1
- Excel, Sheets, LibreOffice and other programs: The inspected 1.12.62 function help contains an Excel-compatibility note, but the current web manual does not explicitly certify Excel compatibility for IMSECH. The note is not a full behavioral comparison by version and locale. No other spreadsheet was used as evidence for Gnumeric calculations; cross-import and cross-product equivalence require separate testing. S1 M1
Related Gnumeric guides (canonical source links checked)
Official references and claim-level evidence (checked 2026-10-13)
| ID | Source | Exact supported claim and verification limit |
|---|---|---|
| M1 | Gnumeric Manual, Complex category | Lists IMSECH, synopsis IMSECH(z), required complex argument and generic invalid-input note; definitions and related functions as applicable. |
| C1 | Gnumeric official function catalogue | Lists IMSECH as Complete / Exhaustive, referring to upstream classification rather than this tutorial’s runtime tests. |
| S1 | Official Gnumeric 1.12.62 source | Exact release complex callbacks and shared parser inspected after archive checksum verification; no native execution. |
| R1 | Official Gnumeric 1.12.62 announcement | Current version context, September 2026 release and general complex-compatibility improvements; does not establish this formula’s executed result. |
Evidence limitations
No native Gnumeric execution, application screenshots, locale tests or workbook round-trip checks were performed. Source review and independent calculations do not replace application-level testing.