COSH in SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026: hyperbolic cosine, syntax and examples
How COSH works in PlanMaker with accurate results, even symmetry, catenary-style examples and Excel compatibility cautions.
Verification status: Official documentation referenced; example outcomes independently reasoned or arithmetically checked where stated. Not executed in SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026. How formula examples are checked
Quick answer: =COSH(Number) calculates the hyperbolic cosine of a real numeric input. The official PlanMaker 2026 example is COSH(0.1), reported as 1.005. More digits from independent mathematical calculation are 1.005004168056. =COSH(0) has a mathematical result of 1, and =COSH(-1) has the same result as =COSH(1), approximately 1.543080634815. None of those extended values were produced by running PlanMaker. SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026 COSH, checked 2026-10-13.
What COSH calculates — and what it does not
The mathematical definition is cosh(x) = (e^x + e^(-x))/2. COSH is even: COSH(-x)=COSH(x). Over the real numbers it has a minimum of 1 at x=0 and increases as |x| increases. This is not the ordinary cosine of an angle: =COS(0) is also 1, but ordinary COS(x) oscillates between −1 and 1, whereas real-number COSH(x) is at least 1. The official COSH page establishes PlanMaker’s function name and broad purpose; these additional comparisons follow from mathematics, not undocumented PlanMaker implementation.
Use COSH when a formula explicitly calls for the hyperbolic cosine: mathematical modelling, certain geometric curves, hyperbolic identities and comparison of symmetric positive/negative inputs. Do not use COSH for a conventional angle in degrees or radians unless your mathematical model specifically requires the hyperbolic function.
Exact syntax and input requirements
=COSH(Number)
| Argument | Required? | Expected input | Function of the argument |
|---|---|---|---|
Number |
Yes | One real numeric value, cell reference or numerical expression | Returns the hyperbolic cosine of the number. No optional argument or default is documented. |
The same one-argument function is documented in both the English PlanMaker 2026 and PlanMaker 2024 references. No multi-argument separator is needed for COSH. Examples use a decimal dot as shown in the English docs; whether a decimal comma, translated function name, numeric-text coercion or particular separators are accepted depends on locale/application settings and has not been natively checked. SoftMaker 2026 COSH · SoftMaker 2024 COSH, checked 2026-10-13.
Reproducible worksheet example
Enter the inputs shown in A2:A8, place =COSH(A2) in B2, and fill downward through B8. The following are independently calculated expected values; increase displayed decimal places if comparing.
| Row | A: input | B: PlanMaker formula | Expected B result (independent math) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 |
=COSH(A2) |
1 |
| 3 | 0.1 |
=COSH(A3) |
1.005004168056 |
| 4 | 0.5 |
=COSH(A4) |
1.127625965206 |
| 5 | -0.5 |
=COSH(A5) |
1.127625965206 |
| 6 | 1 |
=COSH(A6) |
1.543080634815 |
| 7 | -1 |
=COSH(A7) |
1.543080634815 |
| 8 | 2 |
=COSH(A8) |
3.762195691084 |
COSH(0.1) reproduces the rounded vendor example 1.005 at three decimal places. The long decimals above are expectations from Python’s math.cosh, not proven byte-for-byte values in a PlanMaker build. For financial and scientific calculations, inspect number formatting, rounding and data provenance rather than expecting every displayed digit to match.
Advanced formulas with real-world-style inputs
1. A symmetric catenary-style curve (illustrative geometry)
The mathematical catenary form y = a*COSH(x/a) is a way to create a symmetric curve around x=0. This does not by itself calculate a real cable installation’s clearance, tension or safety factors; the correct parameter and physical model must come from engineering analysis.
Place 10 in B1 as the curve-scale parameter a, and 5 in A2 as a horizontal coordinate x. In B2 enter:
=$B$1*COSH(A2/$B$1)
The expected B2 result is approximately 11.276259652064 (in the same chosen length units as the two inputs). To calculate the mathematical height above its minimum at x=0, put in C2:
=$B$1*(COSH(A2/$B$1)-1)
The independently predicted C2 result is 1.276259652064. Change A2 to -5: B2 and C2 should remain unchanged because COSH is an even function. This simple two-cell model is valuable as a geometry demonstration, not a substitute for an engineered design.
2. Verify symmetry on an input table
With 1 in A2, put =COSH(A2)-COSH(-A2) in B2. The mathematical answer is 0. Repeat for several positive and negative inputs to identify sign mistakes in a longer model. At large magnitudes, number representation and runtime numeric limits may affect evaluation; this is a conceptual check, not a native PlanMaker precision certification.
3. Cross-check with exponentials
With 0.5 in A2, compare =COSH(A2) to =(EXP(A2)+EXP(-A2))/2. Both should give approximately 1.127625965206 by mathematical definition. The alternative expression is a validation identity, not a statement about internal PlanMaker algorithms. For very large positive or negative inputs, the EXP terms may overflow or cause numerical issues before a built-in function does; actual thresholds are not documented or tested here. SoftMaker EXP documentation · SoftMaker COSH.
4. Hyperbolic Pythagorean identity
With 0.45 in A2, enter =COSH(A2)^2-SINH(A2)^2 in B2. It should be 1, mathematically. A small floating-point discrepancy should be assessed using a tolerance such as =ABS(B2-1)<0.00000001, rather than strict equality. SINH is a separate, officially documented PlanMaker function. SoftMaker SINH.
5. A logarithm-based exact-value check
Place 2 in A2, and type =COSH(LN(A2)) in B2. The expected mathematical result is exactly 1.25, since cosh(ln 2) = (2 + 1/2)/2. Contrast =SINH(LN(A2)), which is expected to be 0.75. The input to LN must be positive. This is a reproducible relationship check rather than evidence that the two engines perform identically in all corner cases. PlanMaker LN.
Troubleshooting and documented limits
| Symptom | Likely issue | What to check or change |
|---|---|---|
| A negative COSH result is displayed for a real input | COSH cannot be negative for a mathematically valid real argument | Check whether the formula is COS instead of COSH, whether input is actually numeric, or whether the value comes from an unrelated calculation. |
| Result appears surprisingly large | Hyperbolic cosine grows rapidly as absolute input increases | Confirm the scale and units and inspect the input. For example, COSH(2) is expected to be about 3.762, not bounded by 1. |
The result for -1 differs from 1 |
The even-symmetry identity may have been obscured by references or transformations | Evaluate =COSH(1) and =COSH(-1) separately with sufficient display precision. |
| Formula displays as plain text | Entry missing =, pasted with an apostrophe, or cell format set to text |
Set a numerical/general cell format and re-enter the formula. |
| Pasted decimal or numeric text fails | Locale or type-coercion handling differs from the source example | Use one truly numeric input cell in the active locale; do not assume Excel-style coercion without verification. |
| Extremely large input produces an error or unusual value | Numeric range/overflow or floating-point limitation | Reduce magnitude or reformulate analytically if justified. There is no independently established PlanMaker numeric cutoff in this guide. |
| You intended an angle in degrees | COSH is hyperbolic cosine, not ordinary angle cosine | Use the trigonometric COS function and documented angle conversion as appropriate. |
The official function reference does not enumerate all error codes, numeric-text conversion rules, extreme-input thresholds or platform-specific runtime limitations. This guide therefore does not promise #NUM!, #VALUE! or a specific overflow sentinel for untested cases. Likewise, whether an installation accepts named arguments or complex-number inputs is not established here. See official PlanMaker 2026 COSH.
Version, edition, locale and Excel compatibility evidence
| Software / environment | What the cited documentation confirms | Limits of this evidence |
|---|---|---|
| SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026, English manual | COSH(Number) is documented and COSH(0.1) is shown with result 1.005. |
No independently executed formulas on any desktop/mobile platform or edition. |
| SoftMaker PlanMaker 2024, English manual | The same name, one-argument syntax and rounded example are documented. | This confirms documentation presence, not precise build-level interchange or every language configuration. |
| PlanMaker 2021 and earlier | Not asserted here; an independently accessible, checked official source was unavailable during this run. | Version introduction and earlier-version runtime behaviour remain open. |
| Microsoft Excel | Microsoft documents COSH(number) for Excel for Microsoft 365, Excel 2024, 2021, 2019 and 2016 and shows COSH(4) → approximately 27.308233. |
PlanMaker-to-Excel workbook compatibility, exact precision, error parity and locale translation have not been tested. |
Documentation-level syntax agreement does not verify actual interoperation for a saved Excel or PlanMaker file. For an important workbook, test the target version and locale using representative data and record any differences. SoftMaker 2026 · SoftMaker 2024 · Microsoft Excel COSH, all checked 2026-10-13.
Related functions and checked sources
- SINH — hyperbolic sine: use with COSH in identities and transformations.
- TANH — hyperbolic tangent: equals
SINH(x)/COSH(x)mathematically. - ACOSH — inverse hyperbolic cosine: inverse branch for inputs at least 1;
ACOSH(COSH(x))mathematically givesABS(x), not x for negative x. - EXP — exponential: useful for teaching the exponential definition.
- COS — ordinary angle cosine: separate trigonometric function for radians.
Claim-level evidence ledger (checked 2026-10-13): SoftMaker 2026 COSH confirms the function name, syntax, meaning and example; SoftMaker 2024 COSH supports historical documentation continuity; Microsoft Excel COSH supports only the stated Excel comparison and its named versions. The catenary, symmetry, logarithm and identity results are independent mathematics verified with Python; no native PlanMaker or Excel execution, screenshots occurred.