Contact

COSH in SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026: hyperbolic cosine, syntax and examples

Math Intermediate SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026

How COSH works in PlanMaker with accurate results, even symmetry, catenary-style examples and Excel compatibility cautions.

Verification status: Official documentation referenced; example outcomes independently reasoned or arithmetically checked where stated. Not executed in SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026. How formula examples are checked

Quick answer: =COSH(Number) calculates the hyperbolic cosine of a real numeric input. The official PlanMaker 2026 example is COSH(0.1), reported as 1.005. More digits from independent mathematical calculation are 1.005004168056. =COSH(0) has a mathematical result of 1, and =COSH(-1) has the same result as =COSH(1), approximately 1.543080634815. None of those extended values were produced by running PlanMaker. SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026 COSH, checked 2026-10-13.

What COSH calculates — and what it does not

The mathematical definition is cosh(x) = (e^x + e^(-x))/2. COSH is even: COSH(-x)=COSH(x). Over the real numbers it has a minimum of 1 at x=0 and increases as |x| increases. This is not the ordinary cosine of an angle: =COS(0) is also 1, but ordinary COS(x) oscillates between −1 and 1, whereas real-number COSH(x) is at least 1. The official COSH page establishes PlanMaker’s function name and broad purpose; these additional comparisons follow from mathematics, not undocumented PlanMaker implementation.

Use COSH when a formula explicitly calls for the hyperbolic cosine: mathematical modelling, certain geometric curves, hyperbolic identities and comparison of symmetric positive/negative inputs. Do not use COSH for a conventional angle in degrees or radians unless your mathematical model specifically requires the hyperbolic function.

Exact syntax and input requirements

=COSH(Number)
Argument Required? Expected input Function of the argument
Number Yes One real numeric value, cell reference or numerical expression Returns the hyperbolic cosine of the number. No optional argument or default is documented.

The same one-argument function is documented in both the English PlanMaker 2026 and PlanMaker 2024 references. No multi-argument separator is needed for COSH. Examples use a decimal dot as shown in the English docs; whether a decimal comma, translated function name, numeric-text coercion or particular separators are accepted depends on locale/application settings and has not been natively checked. SoftMaker 2026 COSH · SoftMaker 2024 COSH, checked 2026-10-13.

Reproducible worksheet example

Enter the inputs shown in A2:A8, place =COSH(A2) in B2, and fill downward through B8. The following are independently calculated expected values; increase displayed decimal places if comparing.

Row A: input B: PlanMaker formula Expected B result (independent math)
2 0 =COSH(A2) 1
3 0.1 =COSH(A3) 1.005004168056
4 0.5 =COSH(A4) 1.127625965206
5 -0.5 =COSH(A5) 1.127625965206
6 1 =COSH(A6) 1.543080634815
7 -1 =COSH(A7) 1.543080634815
8 2 =COSH(A8) 3.762195691084

COSH(0.1) reproduces the rounded vendor example 1.005 at three decimal places. The long decimals above are expectations from Python’s math.cosh, not proven byte-for-byte values in a PlanMaker build. For financial and scientific calculations, inspect number formatting, rounding and data provenance rather than expecting every displayed digit to match.

Advanced formulas with real-world-style inputs

1. A symmetric catenary-style curve (illustrative geometry)

The mathematical catenary form y = a*COSH(x/a) is a way to create a symmetric curve around x=0. This does not by itself calculate a real cable installation’s clearance, tension or safety factors; the correct parameter and physical model must come from engineering analysis.

Place 10 in B1 as the curve-scale parameter a, and 5 in A2 as a horizontal coordinate x. In B2 enter:

=$B$1*COSH(A2/$B$1)

The expected B2 result is approximately 11.276259652064 (in the same chosen length units as the two inputs). To calculate the mathematical height above its minimum at x=0, put in C2:

=$B$1*(COSH(A2/$B$1)-1)

The independently predicted C2 result is 1.276259652064. Change A2 to -5: B2 and C2 should remain unchanged because COSH is an even function. This simple two-cell model is valuable as a geometry demonstration, not a substitute for an engineered design.

2. Verify symmetry on an input table

With 1 in A2, put =COSH(A2)-COSH(-A2) in B2. The mathematical answer is 0. Repeat for several positive and negative inputs to identify sign mistakes in a longer model. At large magnitudes, number representation and runtime numeric limits may affect evaluation; this is a conceptual check, not a native PlanMaker precision certification.

3. Cross-check with exponentials

With 0.5 in A2, compare =COSH(A2) to =(EXP(A2)+EXP(-A2))/2. Both should give approximately 1.127625965206 by mathematical definition. The alternative expression is a validation identity, not a statement about internal PlanMaker algorithms. For very large positive or negative inputs, the EXP terms may overflow or cause numerical issues before a built-in function does; actual thresholds are not documented or tested here. SoftMaker EXP documentation · SoftMaker COSH.

4. Hyperbolic Pythagorean identity

With 0.45 in A2, enter =COSH(A2)^2-SINH(A2)^2 in B2. It should be 1, mathematically. A small floating-point discrepancy should be assessed using a tolerance such as =ABS(B2-1)<0.00000001, rather than strict equality. SINH is a separate, officially documented PlanMaker function. SoftMaker SINH.

5. A logarithm-based exact-value check

Place 2 in A2, and type =COSH(LN(A2)) in B2. The expected mathematical result is exactly 1.25, since cosh(ln 2) = (2 + 1/2)/2. Contrast =SINH(LN(A2)), which is expected to be 0.75. The input to LN must be positive. This is a reproducible relationship check rather than evidence that the two engines perform identically in all corner cases. PlanMaker LN.

Troubleshooting and documented limits

Symptom Likely issue What to check or change
A negative COSH result is displayed for a real input COSH cannot be negative for a mathematically valid real argument Check whether the formula is COS instead of COSH, whether input is actually numeric, or whether the value comes from an unrelated calculation.
Result appears surprisingly large Hyperbolic cosine grows rapidly as absolute input increases Confirm the scale and units and inspect the input. For example, COSH(2) is expected to be about 3.762, not bounded by 1.
The result for -1 differs from 1 The even-symmetry identity may have been obscured by references or transformations Evaluate =COSH(1) and =COSH(-1) separately with sufficient display precision.
Formula displays as plain text Entry missing =, pasted with an apostrophe, or cell format set to text Set a numerical/general cell format and re-enter the formula.
Pasted decimal or numeric text fails Locale or type-coercion handling differs from the source example Use one truly numeric input cell in the active locale; do not assume Excel-style coercion without verification.
Extremely large input produces an error or unusual value Numeric range/overflow or floating-point limitation Reduce magnitude or reformulate analytically if justified. There is no independently established PlanMaker numeric cutoff in this guide.
You intended an angle in degrees COSH is hyperbolic cosine, not ordinary angle cosine Use the trigonometric COS function and documented angle conversion as appropriate.

The official function reference does not enumerate all error codes, numeric-text conversion rules, extreme-input thresholds or platform-specific runtime limitations. This guide therefore does not promise #NUM!, #VALUE! or a specific overflow sentinel for untested cases. Likewise, whether an installation accepts named arguments or complex-number inputs is not established here. See official PlanMaker 2026 COSH.

Version, edition, locale and Excel compatibility evidence

Software / environment What the cited documentation confirms Limits of this evidence
SoftMaker PlanMaker 2026, English manual COSH(Number) is documented and COSH(0.1) is shown with result 1.005. No independently executed formulas on any desktop/mobile platform or edition.
SoftMaker PlanMaker 2024, English manual The same name, one-argument syntax and rounded example are documented. This confirms documentation presence, not precise build-level interchange or every language configuration.
PlanMaker 2021 and earlier Not asserted here; an independently accessible, checked official source was unavailable during this run. Version introduction and earlier-version runtime behaviour remain open.
Microsoft Excel Microsoft documents COSH(number) for Excel for Microsoft 365, Excel 2024, 2021, 2019 and 2016 and shows COSH(4) → approximately 27.308233. PlanMaker-to-Excel workbook compatibility, exact precision, error parity and locale translation have not been tested.

Documentation-level syntax agreement does not verify actual interoperation for a saved Excel or PlanMaker file. For an important workbook, test the target version and locale using representative data and record any differences. SoftMaker 2026 · SoftMaker 2024 · Microsoft Excel COSH, all checked 2026-10-13.

Claim-level evidence ledger (checked 2026-10-13): SoftMaker 2026 COSH confirms the function name, syntax, meaning and example; SoftMaker 2024 COSH supports historical documentation continuity; Microsoft Excel COSH supports only the stated Excel comparison and its named versions. The catenary, symmetry, logarithm and identity results are independent mathematics verified with Python; no native PlanMaker or Excel execution, screenshots occurred.