Contact

PlanMaker PEARSON: Signed Correlation and Nonlinear Counterexamples

Statistical Intermediate SoftMaker PlanMaker

Use PlanMaker PEARSON with reproducible worksheets, positive and negative endpoint examples and a zero-correlation nonlinear pattern.

Verification status: See the evidence and test scope described in this guide. How formula examples are checked

PEARSON returns a signed correlation coefficient between −1 and 1. It describes linear association: a positive value means the two measurements tend to rise together, while a negative value means one tends to fall as the other rises.

Availability and version history

  • Introduced: Documented by the PlanMaker 2010 manual; the first introduction release is not established.
  • Availability: Documented in PlanMaker 2026; this is not a final working-version endpoint.
  • Scope: The reference belongs to the 2026/NX manual family. Individual FreeOffice and mobile-build availability remains unverified.
  • Checked: October 14, 2026, against the official function reference. Examples use vendor results and independent calculations; no native PlanMaker test was performed.

Syntax

=PEARSON(Range1, Range2)

The two required arguments are cell references to numeric data sets. The official entry says that empty cells, text and logical values are ignored. Different numbers of values produce #N/A.

Use complete paired observations in aligned rows. The entry does not specify all details of alignment when the two ranges have different patterns of nonnumeric cells. A coefficient should not be used to hide a data-cleaning decision.

Formulas use English names and comma separators. If your setup uses another separator, change the punctuation consistently.

Example: reconstruct a correlation coefficient

Create MeasuredPairs with the following values in A1:B6. Reserve C:G for calculations and I for summaries.

Row A: Input B: Response
2 1 2
3 2 4
4 3 5
5 4 4
6 5 5

Enter =PEARSON(A2:A6,B2:B6) in I2. The expected value is approximately 0.774596669.

Put =AVERAGE(A2:A6) in I4 and =AVERAGE(B2:B6) in I5. These return 3 and 4. Enter headers dx, dy, dx×dy, dx², dy² in C1:G1. In C2:G2 enter:

=A2-$I$4
=B2-$I$5
=C2*D2
=C2^2
=D2^2

Fill C2:G2 through row 6.

Row dx dy dx×dy dx² dy²
2 -2 -2 4 4 4
3 -1 0 0 1 0
4 0 1 0 0 1
5 1 0 0 1 0
6 2 1 2 4 1

The totals are 6, 10 and 6 for columns E, F and G. In I7 enter =SUM(E2:E6)/SQRT(SUM(F2:F6)*SUM(G2:G6)). This gives 6/SQRT(60), agreeing with I2. In I8 enter =I2^2; the result is 0.6, the corresponding squared correlation.

Changing scale does not create a stronger relationship

Add Transformed response in K1 and Negative response in L1. Enter =100+10*B2 in K2 and =-B2 in L2. Fill both through row 6.

Result cell Formula Expected result
N2 =PEARSON(A2:A6,K2:K6) 0.774596669
N3 =PEARSON(A2:A6,L2:L6) -0.774596669
N4 =PEARSON(B2:B6,A2:A6) 0.774596669
N5 =CORREL(A2:A6,B2:B6) 0.774596669

Displayed results are rounded. Adding a constant and applying a positive scale leave this coefficient unchanged. Multiplying one series by −1 changes its sign. These are mathematical checks for the complete numeric fixture, not claims about every mixed-type edge case of the two functions.

Zero correlation can conceal a clear curve

Create another worksheet named CurvedPairs. Enter −2, −1, 0, 1, 2 in A2:A6, with x in A1. Put x squared in B1; enter =A2^2 in B2 and fill to B6, producing 4, 1, 0, 1, 4.

In D2 enter =PEARSON(A2:A6,B2:B6). The expected result is 0. Yet every response is exactly the square of its input. The positive and negative cross-products cancel; a zero linear correlation does not mean there is no relationship. Plotting the pairs exposes the curve that the single coefficient misses.

Vendor endpoint examples

On a separate worksheet named VendorPearson, put 1, 2, 3 in A1:A3; 2, 3, 4 in B1:B3; and 4, 3, 2 in C1:C3.

  • D1: =PEARSON(A1:A3,B1:B3) returns 1.
  • D2: =PEARSON(A1:A3,C1:C3) returns −1.

These reproduce the two examples in the PlanMaker reference. Perfect correlation refers to a straight-line relationship, not to equality of the numbers.

Checks before interpreting the result

Inspect the paired rows, a scatter plot and the number of observations. Correlation alone does not establish causation, remove the influence of an unusual point, or determine whether a fitted line will predict new observations well.

A constant series has zero squared deviation, making the mathematical coefficient undefined. The cited entry does not name its native error token. Its explicit #N/A statement concerns mismatched value counts; do not generalize that token to every invalid input.

  • CORREL for another documented correlation function.
  • RSQ for squared correlation.
  • SLOPE for a fitted change in response per input unit.
  • AVERAGE for the centering calculation.